Is elena kagan gay

Sometimes the right answer for the courts is to step aside and let politics do its job. What she did say was this:. Sign Up. As ofshe is the most recent justice appointed without any prior judicial experience.

Supreme Court sharply questions : Kagan presided on Sunday over the wedding of former

Governance Studies. Washington, and Kisor v. But the court must also recognize the limits on itself and respect the choices made by the American people. But every time I commute from my office in Washington to my home in Virginia, my marriage magically dissolves like some matrimonial Cheshire Cat, because Virginia constitutionally bans any recognition of it.

The plaintiffs say marriage is a civil right, and when a civil right is assailed, the Supreme Court has no choice but to take command.

What each Supreme Court : In , the year before Obergefell, Justice Elena Kagan —nominated by Obama in —officiated her first same-sex marriage in a Maryland ceremony for her former law clerk and his husband

In her testimony, Ms. The Brookings Institution is committed to quality, independence, and impact. While the Senate considers Ms. Whatever he decides is likely to be appealed, presumably up to the court that Ms. Kagan seems likely to join.

It is primarily about who gets to decide. I say this knowing how deeply it stings gay Americans to let states make invidious choices. Elena Kagan is not a lesbian, one of her best friends told POLITICO Tuesday night, responding to persistent rumors and innuendo about the Supreme Court nominee’s personal life.

But the gay-marriage debate, while assuredly a civil rights argument, is much more than that. Civil rights, she implies, are important, but so is judicial modesty, and a sensible judge balances the two. In line with our values and policieseach Brookings publication represents the sole views of its author s.

Sections Sections. She favored a consensus-building approach until the conservative supermajority's decision to overturn Roe v. We are supported by a diverse array of funders. It is also a debate about the meaning of marriage, about the pace of change in a conflicted society and about who gets to decide.

This is how second-class citizenship feels. She has written the majority opinion in some landmark cases, such as Cooper v. Kagan seems to reject both forms of absolutism. What straight couple would tolerate that? Sparking the interest was a nearly two-decades-old picture of Kagan playing softball on the front.

Shortly before we married, we visited a lawyer who explained that it would cost thousands of dollars to draw up documents protecting us in states that, like Virginia, treat us as legal strangers — documents making Michael my heir, giving him access to my hospital room, allowing him to make financial decisions should I be incapacitated.

Even so, our pricey paperwork could replicate only a few of the perquisites of marriage, and only imperfectly at that. Kagan may not have had gay marriage in mind when she made that statement, but it could not be more relevant. It all stems from speculation in the media that Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan is a lesbian.

This case is not primarily about the merits of gay marriage. Harris, Chiafalo v. Wade.